Why can’t all the world’s religions be true?

The challenge of accepting the idea that all religions are true (religious pluralism) stems from the fact that the individual religions teach essential things that logically contradict one another. For example, their disagreement about the existence of God or gods is just one of many examples demonstrating how profoundly the world’s religions differ:

  • Islam affirms one God.
  • Popular Hinduism affirms 330 million gods.
  • Philosophical Hinduism affirms all as god.
  • Original Buddhism affirms no god.

So the world’s religions collectively can’t agree on whether there is a god or how many there are. Moreover, even those religions that arguably share the most in common—the Middle Eastern monotheistic faiths of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—also have great differences.

For example: Is God one being, one person (unitarianism) as traditional Judaism and Islam insist? Or is God one being, three persons (trinitarianism) as historic Christianity declares?

Also: Was Jesus a false or mistaken Messiah (traditional Judaism)? Or was he a mere human prophet (Islam)? Or was he the divine-human Messiah and Savior (Christianity)?

Again, the fact that the world’s religions make essential claims that logically contradict one another makes religious pluralism an unacceptable option.

Revelation versus Religion
However, maybe there is a major disconnect between divine revelation on one hand and the human practice of religion on the other. That’s the challenge a reader of my blog recently presented to me.

Here’s the challenge (paraphrased) followed by my response.

Respondent: Divine revelation consists of the truths that God has revealed to humankind. But religion is the practice of how human beings have understood, or more accurately, mostly misunderstood that revelation.

Holding firmly to any human interpretation of divine revelation is an almost foolproof way to remain lost. If you doubt this, just look to the Pharisees of Jesus Christ’s day.

For I would propose that those who truly understand and accept the inner essence of the Qur’an and the Bible recognize them as cohering and coming from the same divine root. It’s similar to how Christians recognize that both the New Testament and Old Testament come from the same divine fount.

My Response: Greetings, friend. You have raised an interesting challenge concerning the truth of the world’s religions. Here’s my five-point response for your consideration:

  1. Though I generally accept your basic distinction between revelation (divinely given) and religion (humanly received), there’s no reason to conclude that human beings can’t have a truthful understanding of the revelation even if it is limited in understanding. Orthodox Judaism, historic Christianity, and traditional Islam all believe they have been given doctrinal truth about God. However, if we give the religions the benefit of the doubt and accept the claims made by the faith’s founders or leaders, some of those doctrinal positions logically contradict one another, so they can’t all be correct.
  2. In the New Testament gospels, Jesus Christ never condemned the Jewish religious leaders for affirming the doctrinal truth of the Shema (Deut. 6:4) nor of the imago Dei (Gen. 1:26–28). In fact, Jesus insisted that people needed to hold firmly to those great revealed truths (Mark 12:29–31).
  3. The individual religions of Orthodox Judaism, historic Christianity, and traditional Islam reject the idea that the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), the New Testament, and the Qur’an all cohere and teach the same thing. Traditional Judaism and theologically conservative Christianity share much, if not most, in common and yet even they differ over the identity and mission of Jesus Christ, which is at the center of the Christian faith. Thus, to claim that the three Middle Eastern monotheist religions teach the exact same message is to say that Orthodox Judaism, historic Christianity, and traditional Islam are all wrong. And yet each religion would say they alone understand the revelation (kind of sounds like the Pharisees you referenced).
  4. Where’s the divine revelation that says Jews, Christians, and Muslims have all misinterpreted the revelation given to their respective communities and that the Tanakh, the New Testament, and Qur’an all agree? And if we accept that there is a difference between revelation and religion how do religious adherents know that the new pluralist view is correct and the exclusive beliefs of the traditional religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are wrong?
  5. Orthodox Jews don’t think the New Testament is on par with the Torah. Traditional Muslims don’t think the Old and New Testaments are on par with the Qur’an. Historic Christians don’t think the Qur’an is on par with the Bible.

But saying that the revelations of the three Middle Eastern monotheistic religions (as are reasonably interpreted by their religious communities) are not in conflict on some important truths is simply incorrect.

I appreciate the issue of revelation versus religion that you raised. It is an important topic to think through carefully.

Takeaway
Consider that for religious pluralism to be true then the actual claims and beliefs of the world’s religions themselves must be largely false. Another way of saying it is that to get all the religions to agree we must first conclude that all the religions have—on some fundamentally important things—gotten it wrong.

Reflections: Your Turn
As a Christian, have you ever spoken with a Jew or a Muslim about where your faiths agree and disagree? Visit Reflections to comment.

Resources

Check out more from Reasons to Believe @Reasons.org

About The Author

Kenneth R. Samples

I believe deeply that "all truth is God’s truth." That historic affirmation means that when we discover and grasp truth in the world and in life we move closer to its divine Author. This approach relies on the Christian idea of God’s two revelatory books - the metaphorical book of nature and the literal book of Scripture. As an RTB scholar I have a great passion to help people understand and see the truth and relevance of Christianity's truth-claims. My writings and lectures at RTB focus on showing how the great doctrinal truths of the faith (the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Atonement, creation ex nihilo, salvation by grace, etc.) are uniquely compatible with reason. This approach reflects the historic Christian apologetics statement - "faith seeking understanding." I work to help myself and others fulfill Peter's words in 2 Peter 3:18: "But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen." As an RTB scholar I have a great passion to help people understand and see the truth and relevance of Christianity's truth-claims. • Biography • Resources • Upcoming Events • Promotional Items Kenneth Richard Samples began voraciously studying Christian philosophy and theology when his thirst for purpose found relief in the Bible. He earned his undergraduate degree in philosophy and social science from Concordia University and his MA in theological studies from Talbot School of Theology. For seven years, Kenneth worked as Senior Research Consultant and Correspondence Editor at the Christian Research Institute (CRI) and regularly cohosted the popular call-in radio program, The Bible Answer Man, with Dr. Walter Martin. As a youth, Kenneth wrestled with "unsettling feelings of meaninglessness and boredom," driving him to seek answers to life's big questions. An encounter with Christian philosophy in Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis led Kenneth to examine the New Testament and "finally believe that Jesus Christ is the divine Son of God, the Lord and Savior of the world." From then on, he pursued an intellectually satisfying faith. Today, as senior research scholar at Reasons to Believe (RTB), Kenneth uses what he's learned to help others find the answers to life's questions. He encourages believers to develop a logically defensible faith and challenges skeptics to engage Christianity at a philosophical level. He is the author of Without a Doubt and A World of Difference, and has contributed to numerous other books, including: Lights in the Sky and Little Green Men, The Cult of the Virgin, and Prophets of the Apocalypse. He has written articles for Christianity Today and The Christian Research Journal, and regularly participates in RTB's podcasts, including Straight Thinking, a podcast dedicated to encouraging Christians to utilize sound reasoning in their apologetics. He also writes for the ministry's daily blog, Today’s New Reason to Believe. An avid speaker and debater, Kenneth has appeared on numerous radio programs such as Voice America Radio, Newsmakers, The Frank Pastore Show, Stand to Reason, White Horse Inn, Talk New York, and Issues Etc., as well as participated in debates and dialogues on topics relating to Christian doctrine and apologetics. He currently lectures for the Master of Arts program in Christian Apologetics at Biola University. Kenneth also teaches adult classes at Christ Reformed Church in Southern California. Over the years Kenneth has held memberships in the American Philosophical Association, the Evangelical Philosophical Society, the Evangelical Theological Society, and the Evangelical Press Association. The son of a decorated World War II veteran, Kenneth is an enthusiastic student of American history, particularly the Civil War and WWII. His favorite Christian thinkers include Athanasius, Augustine, Pascal, and C. S. Lewis. He greatly enjoys the music of the Beatles and is a die-hard Los Angeles Lakers fan. Kenneth lives in Southern California with his wife, Joan, and their three children.



Email Sign-up

Sign up for the TWR360 Newsletter

Access updates, news, Biblical teaching and inspirational messages from powerful Christian voices.

Thank you for signing up to receive updates from TWR360.

Required information missing

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy & Terms of Use apply.